Re: ~*chuckling*~Posted by Catherine Cartwright-Jones on January 26, 2004 at 08:36:10: In reply to: ~*chuckling*~ posted by Fia on January 26, 2004 at 06:13:56: : Oh my... Certainly an eye-opener and enough material for more than afew good : laughs... Another load of books came in through interlibrary loan. Henna (with indigo, chamomile and varaints) were the ONLY hair dyes prior to 1900. By 1926, people had started using aniline dyes in hair and were having health disasters and doctors were raging against PPD dyes for hair. In 1937, the cosmetic industry petitioned the FDA to permit them to have PPD in their forumuae at no more than 6%, and the FDA approved that. In 1940, that textbook hustled PPD dyes hard, offered that overly complex, rather off-putting, henna procedure. A text from the mid 60's REALLY badmouths henna (I'll get this up here) and is very dismissive of the dangers of PPD. I'll try to get all this stuff up as fast as I can. If you read through the chronology, you can see exactly why beauticians think henna is bad. Their schools have TAUGHT them that henna is bad, and much of what's in those textbooks is grossly biased or dead wrong!
Follow Ups |
Post Followup | ||
Served by ruboard 2.1.1; Copyright © 1998 by Andrew Maltsev. |