Re: Diane, no need to be nastyPosted by Diane on May 7, 2004 at 16:48:58: In reply to: Diane, no need to be nasty posted by Truthseeker :) on May 7, 2004 at 09:57:07: : Diane, my post was clarifying and joyful. It is not in the spiritof : this site to dismiss another member's post in a scornful way. I am : sorry that you feel a little bitter about my clarification but every : human being likes to be credited and recognized, specially if they : take the time to research and write for everyone's benefit. Your : dismissive "pat,pat,pat" is not appreciated but will only drive away : people like me that are willing to give their time to Catherine's : forum. : Life is short. Maybe you just were having a bad hair day... Good gracious me! Did you really interpret that post as nasty?! If I could have said it to you in person it would have been in a teasing manner, I don't know how you normally react to teasing. I have no reason to be bitter about anything. I was actually rather amused that's all. I couldn't, and still can't see the reason for the secrecy -- nor did I see anything earthshattering in the revelations about Avigal henna. I actually posted a question about Avigal weeks and weeks ago. Others have also posted about Avigal. It only took me about an hour on this site to realise that their claim of their product being pure henna was totally spurious. And they are not the only ones who do it. That's all. I am truly sorry if I upset you. I try to always be a grown up when I post and not resort to mudslinging. And no, I haven't had a bad hair day since I found this site!
Follow Ups |
Post Followup | ||
Served by ruboard 2.1.1; Copyright © 1998 by Andrew Maltsev. |