A Question about 'Organics'Posted by Katherine on September 4, 2004 at 23:49:51: Having noted several posts here requesting that productsbe 'organic,' I should greatly appreciate it if some of you could enlighten me on this topic. My understanding - which is arguably limited - is that the term 'organic,' in its most basic application, refers to any carbon-based life form. A more extended use of the word, and the one I think is meant in your posts, seems to refer to the cultivation of plants without the application of commercially produced chemical fertilisers, which passes from the domain of biochemistry into that of ethics and legality. Now: I have been told that, apparently, the strict nutritional value of foods, be they 'organically' produced or not, does not vary one whit in terms of what those foods deliver, so that the whole current marketing of so-called 'organic' foods - or cosmetics - represents another corporate rip-off. More to our point here, does anyone know of any studies which indicate just what kind and rate of pesticide absorption goes on, how that affects the stuff thus grown, and how it is passed on to us? I can't, for my part, imagine that it doesn't have some delerious effect! Sorry for the length of this post, but I have an absolutely disaster-ridden personal production line, including a history of cancer, so I hope you'll understand my concerns and forgive me...TIA.
Follow Ups |
Post Followup | ||
Served by ruboard 2.1.1; Copyright © 1998 by Andrew Maltsev. |