The fair virgin looks rather bored o/tPosted by Catherine Cartwright-Jones on July 24, 2004 at 14:09:00: In reply to: The fair virgin looks rather bored posted by Elettaria on July 23, 2004 at 22:01:50: : Give me a bold hussy any time. My girlfriend and I tend to call each: other "wench" and "baggage" (she's nicknamed "mystical baggage", which : came up in "A Chaste Maid in Cheapside"), need I say more. My thought on that one was "Oh my! Is it possible that I'm finally going to get a decent sh*g after a decade of sweaty gropes and limp humps from spotty half-drunken prats in the Midlands? How fast can I feighn purity?" I thought it was one of the funniest damn pics I've ever found! I really didn't appreciate the scimitar fondling until I scanned it and saw it full size. Victorian Ron Jeremy there! Looking through the Victorian accounts of sexuality in the "orient" is pretty interesting. Much like reading science fiction. You see social norms and prevailing fantasies written out as plot. Victorian women seemed to crave a decent shag while not actually being able to actually waking up and say (as does one of my favorite comedians) "St*ck *t N*W!!!) Many orientalist scripts (and trekkie, and SCAdian) involve a virile barbarian male who forcibly secudes (NOT the same as rape) a woman. This allowed ladies to get a decent shag without a socially unacceptable breach of "ladies are so genteel that they don't desire sex and if they're really upperclass they never enjoy it". Yeh. Right. Talk to the Hitachi Magic Wand. My rant? Women love sex. They love really, really good sex. Many of the ancient civilizations, a coupla filmmakers, many people I know personally, and a few gynaecologists, recognize that a healthy woman is ............. awesome. No comparison. These "orientalist" fantasies played upon that without actually giving a poor girl a gift certificate to goodvibes.
Follow Ups
|
Post Followup | ||
Served by ruboard 2.1.1; Copyright © 1998 by Andrew Maltsev. |