You like the Victorians? BewarePosted by Elettaria on July 24, 2004 at 17:57:36: In reply to: The fair virgin looks rather bored o/t posted by Catherine Cartwright-Jones on July 24, 2004 at 14:09:00: I might try to corner you and talk shop about my dissertation, whichis all about those little buggers. Dracula and the Turn of the Screw to be precise, originals and staged versions (play by Lochhead, opera by Britten respectively), and the title is "Voicing the Silent: Gothic on Page and Stage". So yes, looking at how desire is voiced, or not voiced as the case usually is, or more accurately voiced in a way that pretends it's not being voiced. I mean, look at Dracula. The only way women can get any action (with mysterious man from exotic country) in that book is to be sleepwalking or in a convenient trance. And then there's all the homoeroticism. Just been rereading Carmilla, which is absolutely crawling with lesbian eroticism but just about pretending they're "just good friends" and it's Laura's blood (from the neck) that Carmilla is sucking at. The stuff with children is freaking me out rather, I have to confess. Creepy lot, the Victorians. It's funny, we think it's something modern, the way women are expected to look like little girls (or at least starve themselves that thin, and considering what little girls are wearing these days there's not as much difference as there should be in the clothing department), but the Victorians were totally obsessed with it. it's the way she's looking away with an expression of modesty (er, more of blankness) on her face, and leaning away, but reaching towards him with one hand and gripping her thigh with the other, isn't it.
Follow Ups
|
Post Followup | ||
Served by ruboard 2.1.1; Copyright © 1998 by Andrew Maltsev. |